Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Burns Officially Traded


shaq
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, ichigo1057 said:

Five year deal worth $150 Million Max with 87.5 Mill guaranteed. Too steep a price for me. I'll begrudgingly take the 2nd and whatever 5th we got plus the $24 Mill we free up from his Franchise Tag and move on. Atleast the drama from his contract poo is done and over with.

Very true! Well said...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

Were you hoping we all forgot how much you defended the decision not to trade Burns for 2 1sts and a 2nd at the time? And attacking people who were criticizing the non-trade? Or are you considering yourself one of these Fitterer apologists we’re supposed to dunk on?

That dude is the king of always leaving an out for himself so he can come back and walk back what he said when it ends up wrong 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Dan is any good at the draft, they can pull 2 starters with this trade. Starting OL and WR, for a decent pass rusher that's bad against the run. Remind me again how much Burns has impacted games since being drafted. I honestly can't remember any games he took over. He isn't Peppers, Charles Johnson or Greg Hardy. He was never that guy in Carolina. Maybe he can improve in NY, but this isn't the huge loss to the defense some are making it out to be. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

That dude is the king of always leaving an out for himself so he can come back and walk back what he said when it ends up wrong 

Aren't you the guy who came at my neck multiple times for speaking the truth about Bryce Young last year?

You're welcome to go back and read the threads about the offer at the time yourself. Two of the 3 most sought after positions then and now remain QB's and pass rushers.

The issue isn't just that we turned down the trade for picks that were years away. It's that our former GM went completely stupid and kept one upping himself with all in moves one after the other until he finally got the first overall pick and managed to take the wrong QB. Burns now no matter how one may feel about him is still worth at least one first round pick. No team would give us that because they've seen us give away other players for mediocre return and they know we are absolutely desperate to fix the QB we just drafted. You know. The one you defended tooth and nail.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Herb said:

We could’ve had two first rounders a year ago and now we only get a 2nd and 5th?  All of our good players gone in a couple years time. This franchise is ridiculous. We are the laughing stock of the league. 

those future 1st would have been in the deal for Chicago trade and DJ Moore would still be here under a decent contract

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we went LB at 19, the LB at 51 better be head and shoulders the BPA on our board. I was thinking more like 1st or 2nd and then double dipping in the mid-rounda But yeah, if we went LB back to back jn the 1st and 2nd and they turned out like Star and Short I don't think anyone would be complaining. Well, not many anyway. There's always gonna be a few no matter what. LOL 
    • I have been doing a bunch of mock drafts and this one interesting scenario popped up that made me question myself. I know our needs edge, mike, OT,wr, and secondary. This situation Love fell to 19 and I know we don't NEED a RB. But if we stay out at 19(I don't think we do) I don't think I could say no to love. If this team really believes in BPA and love is there at 19 who realistic is better than love at this point? Love is a top 5 talent, there is no akeem messador or Caleb banks or Kenyon Sadiq type player I think I would rather have than love. He would make Bryce life much easier, he's a homerun threat on a offense that lacks speed. He's essentially modern day Reggie bush to me and I think he could play alongside Chubba on passing down potentially as a slot and be the speed threat we really need. I think it's a bit crazy but I would be willing to wait til the second round and see who falls at edge(I think we land Chubb or loyd in free agency) maybe chase TJ parker if he falls or Rodriguez or golliday in the second/third. What say you?
    • They have also beaten the Rockets, Lakers, Spurs, and Nuggets... 
×
×
  • Create New...