Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Does Bryce deserve another start?

NAS

By NAS,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted

Trade him.

Took him a year and a half, more, to do what he was supposed to do game 1 and that is throw the ball down the field and stretch the defense. 

I feel like he only did it late because he was ordered to. Because it looked like a switch was flipped to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CPantherKing Grand Master

CPantherKing

Posted
Posted

Did Bryce show up like Dalton against the Raiders?

Dalton is still the better QB for the development of XL, Coker and JT Sanders. Bryce is still not where he needs to be and doesn't trust the offense like Dalton has.

Canales seems to struggle more on the sideline with Bryce in the game too compared to Dalton.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
NAS Grand Master

NAS

Posted
  • Author
Posted
5 minutes ago, CPantherKing said:

Did Bryce show up like Dalton against the Raiders?

Dalton is still the better QB for the development of XL, Coker and JT Sanders. Bryce is still not where he needs to be and doesn't trust the offense like Dalton has.

Canales seems to struggle more on the sideline with Bryce in the game too compared to Dalton.

It’s also hard to ignore that Dalton stinker against the Commanders 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Carolina Cajun Mentor

Carolina Cajun

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, NAS said:

It’s also hard to ignore that Dalton stinker against the Commanders 

People just remember the game with the raiders and have forgotten that Dalton wasnt exactly lighting it up his last few starts, and in fairness he was doing it with Johnson and Thielen for a game.  Bryce has looked fine the last 2 weeks, no reason to bench him.  Just play him and see where this goes.  We're still no more committed to him today than we were yesterday.  He can change that, but who knows.  Best case scenario is that at bare minimum he shows enough to be a game manager and grows enough with Legette, Coker, Sanders, and Brooks, then we focus on talent at other positions to improve our team.  If he never outgrows the game manager role, then its easy enough to just move on from him and atleast have a team built out enough that a QB can plug and play.  If he just sucks ass down the stretch and shows no development, then whatever, draft a QB and move on.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dilla Collaborator

Dilla

Posted
Posted

Dalton is clearly better when he is fresh, but the issue is that he is 37 and we could see his arm confidence fall off in real time. I would keep Bryce in until he puts in another inevitable stinker.

 

Next year, we need to sign a younger veteran QB to replace Dalton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SmokinwithWilly Grand Master

SmokinwithWilly

Posted
Posted
39 minutes ago, Dilla said:

Dalton is clearly better when he is fresh, but the issue is that he is 37 and we could see his arm confidence fall off in real time. I would keep Bryce in until he puts in another inevitable stinker.

 

Next year, we need to sign a younger veteran QB to replace Dalton.

If/when BY puts up another stinker, I'd rather see Plummer. Dalton is what he is. Maybe Plummer plays better and shows he's worth keeping as a backup QB/flex starter. What do we have to lose at this point?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

I’m anti-Bryce.  He isn’t an NFL QB.  He serves no purpose here.  

that said, for the same reason Canales was right to bench him after week 2….Bryce technically does indeed deserve another start now. 

because Andy was dog poo the weeks leading up to his injury….and Bryce frankly had a decent day.  He had that deep pass dropped for what should have likely been a TD.  Another big one perfect to XL that ended being a INT on XL.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
raleigh-panther Grand Master

raleigh-panther

Posted
Posted

Reality is he played a very wounded Saints defense today

…what did I read, 4 cornerbacks out, one being Latimore

He just does not play like a top nfl qb …and I just don’t see it….a few of those flutter balls are picks against a top 15 defense 

….and his bailing from the picket to early (always to the right) and misses his reads

look, I’m extremely happy for the W for the players and the fans however to me Bryce isn’t going to ever be a top qb in the nfl

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Mini camp tweets

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      How am I all over the place?  I'm still saying that. I'm saying that Chark at his best and T-Mac right now, on the same team right now for the 2025 season, T-Mac would be ahead of him on the depth chart Week 1. Because in the same way everyone is saying, "T-Mac hasn't played a snap in the NFL yet", the very same is true to say, "nothing Chark did in his past matters moving forward" His peak was a 1,008 yard season where he was the only decent WR on a terrible team.  He didn't put up the 1k yard season because he was a great WR, it was because of how bad the rest of them on the team were. His stats aren't the same as his ability, and his ability was never all that good to begin with. Hell, most of this board agrees that T-Mac is our #1 right now, even if Thielen is Bryce's #1 option early in the saeson just because of the comfort level there, he's still just a slot safety valve and T-Mac is our #1. If you put peak Chark on the roster RIGHT NOW (even without T-Mac)... is anyone even putting him over Thielen, XL, or Coker going into this season? I'm honestly not sure many of us would consider him as such, because even at his best, he was just a JAG.  So if the same people who are okay with T-Mac being ahead of those guys right now, wouldn't put Chark above them, how can you in the same breath say Chark was better than T-Mac already is now?
    • LinvilleGorge
      Mini camp tweets

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • tukafan21
      Mini camp tweets

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
×
×
  • Create New...