Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fitterer says " We'll have to do something with Sam. "


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

Think this is getting blown out of proportion. What we will do with Darnold is put him on IR and in 4 weeks see how Cam is doing. Darnold is signed through 2023. Those who were upset we moved too quickly from Cam seem to have no problem doing the same thing with Darnold. Maybe we should learn from history.

Edited by panthers55
  • Pie 11
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Future of the Funchise said:

I think the best thing for Sam is to sit his ass on the bench and watch and learn how to handle pressure from Cam.

You can't fix what's wrong with him IMO. He's a panicker. You can't fix that panic instinct.

BTW, I told y'all this before he ever played a down for us.

 

 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

Jesus christ this is such a dumpster fire.

 

You get rid of Cam, get Teddy, Get rid of Teddy, Get Sam, only to get Cam back. 

 

Imagine if you actually rolled the dice with Cam instead of taking all these unnecessary steps. 


Who knows. Do you really think we would have given him an extension? I don’t. 
 

It’s highly possible that he would have left last year and we’d have still picked up Sam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's neither on Ickey nor Bryce, that's a coverage sack. There were plenty of examples where he drifted into pressure or didn't move in the right direction, but on this play we sent two men out deep and Max Protected with both TEs and the RB staying back to block. Both receivers were completely covered down the field with zero checkdown options and the pass rush got home. Bryce took a deep drop back due to the PA and to let the receivers get deeper. That was the play design This sack isn't "Clearly on the QB". There were plenty of examples where Bryce drifts in the pocket or bailed toward pressure last season (open up a random clip from the Jags game for examples), but this is not one of them. Blame Frank and his dumbass playcalling/design for sending two slow receivers who don't get open well on deep routes with no other options on this one.
    • Some things look horrible but you had the position covered. Some things look horrible because they really were.
    • Well this one is more like it, 28-3 Falcons in the 3rd before I just stopped.  Sorry.  Bryce lovers: watch the Chicago game not this one. Bet the farm on Bryce.
×
×
  • Create New...