Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

baker is a franchise quarterback


PhillyB
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, PhillyB said:

today sucked but this season might not.

I can agree with that. With some good coaching backing him up, a decent game plan and an offensive like that can block he showed signs that he could be pretty damn good especially in the second half. I'm very curious to how composed he seems the rest of the way as the season goes especially during rough times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Shocker said:

 

 

We need that the whole game. Yes, he finally woke up after the half but that's was after the other team had a comfortable lead. The up and down is exactly why he's playing for Matt Rhule, the same reason Sam is with Matt Rhule, they both are inconsistent.

They'll fool you into thinking they're actually starters when they are far from it. We need a rebuild, not false hope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I didn't expect our CBs to play so poorly. We're fortunate Brissett took awhile to settle in. He missed a lot of open guys early.

He is basically Tyrod Taylor so there is only so much concern to have. Also, some of his throws he was "beating" our DB's on were hard to get too upset about. He did have a few that were great catches by the WR and well placed by him. 

IMO the secondary was more than good enough to win. A little sloppy but overall pretty good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, rippadonn said:

We need that the whole game. Yes, he finally woke up after the half but that's was after the other team had a comfortable lead. The up and down is exactly why he's playing for Matt Rhule, the same reason Sam is with Matt Rhule, they both are inconsistent.

They'll fool you into thinking they're actually starters when they are far from it. We need a rebuild, not false hope.

So a QB that can bring a team back from a 13 point deficit in the fourth and give them a chance to win is something nobody wants in a QB?

Edited by jfra78
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheBigKat said:

Baker reminds me a lot of Jake. He’s a gamer, good enough to will his way to win but not gifted like Cam to just solely dominate. We can win with Baker and he’s the best QB we’ve had since 2019 Newton

He is exactly who the browns fans told us he was.  Fiery competitor that is streaky, throws too many wtf balls, has passes batted down a bunch has to clean throwing lanes to be effective.   We probably can sneak a few wins out with a guy like that but in no way shape or form is he anywhere remotely close to a long term answer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, philit99 said:

Absolutely not. 4/5 were on the center. Every snap was low. The one behind center is tough to pin on, could have been Baker could have been the center. Since Elflien struggled all game, I would blame him.

https://theathletic.com/3585009/2022/09/11/panthers-baker-mayfield-loss-browns-officiating/

"But there was a lot of bad that put the Panthers in that spot to start with, including an inauspicious first half by Baker Mayfield, who threw four batted passes and an interception before halftime. Mayfield also mishandled four snaps, three of which were his fault."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel like Baker honestly could be a franchise guy BUT with a competent coaching staff. He isn’t going to carry incompetent coaches like Cam was able to for a few years

So my worry is that while Tepper is hellbent on proving the “basement” crowd wrong about Rhule he pisses away an opportunity to turn Baker into a franchise guy 

Then next year we’re looking for a coach and a QB. 

If there is one positive to starting 0-1 I have to think that leash got a lot shorter for Rhule yesterday. He lays another stinker in MetLife and at home to the Saints and maybe they’ll be enough time to salvage the Mayfield experiment 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Baker was great in the 4th. But those first two quarters versus the last are a perfect example of the up and down nature of the flaws within his game and why he was available. He's who we've got so I'm on board but he's got tons to prove just like anyone else and there are 16 more games for him to show it.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...