Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CMC injury status?


The Lobo
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, frankw said:

Anyone remember CJ Anderson? It's crazy how we moved on from Ron Rivera for who we thought was going to be a young and innovative mind only to see ourselves fall victim to the same stubborn shenanigans.

Yes I believe we cut him, he signed with the Rams and ran for 300 yards in the last 2 regular season games

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he doesn’t play, I don’t want to hear any excuses about this being the reason our offense fails or for yet another loss in the Matt Rhule era that absolves him and our OC (or QB) of any responsibility. I watched tennesee and Minnesota’s offense work just fine without their lead backs at stages last year. Even two years ago, Mike Davis was able to carry the load without that much of a drop off. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, jamos14 said:

 

We hardly win when he is on the field.

 

 

Honestly, even counting Rivera, this team hasn’t experienced much success with the offense centered around CMC.

The current success model is finding what you think is a forward thinking coach, a QB (whether winnable-with or franchise), meanwhile nesting the top WRs ie Chase/Burrow, Waddle/Hill, Brown/Smith, Evans/Godwin, Kupp/Robinson, Diggs/Davis.

Last year’s Super Bowl wouldn’t have been those teams without Kupp (the real 21 mvp) and Chase.

We’re on year 5ish jamming this square peg into a round hole w/Christian.

I know people think WR isn’t a problem but I see a glaring hole as big as QB and HC. The whole franchise needs to restructure how the offense is built. Well it isn’t even built anyways, no real vision, distinct features or identity.

Root and stem. Minus a few obvious players.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Coreyl90 said:

I would imagine he will play Sunday. You don't show your cards to the media and allow Kingsbury and company to game plan for what's coming

I'm sure they're quaking in their cleats and staying up at night trying to figure out our offense that resembles something my six year old would scratch out in crayon on a napkin.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, davos said:

Honestly, even counting Rivera, this team hasn’t experienced much success with the offense centered around CMC.

The current success model is finding what you think is a forward thinking coach, a QB (whether winnable-with or franchise), meanwhile nesting the top WRs ie Chase/Burrow, Waddle/Hill, Brown/Smith, Evans/Godwin, Kupp/Robinson, Diggs/Davis.

Last year’s Super Bowl wouldn’t have been those teams without Kupp (the real 21 mvp) and Chase.

We’re on year 5ish jamming this square peg into a round hole w/Christian.

I know people think WR isn’t a problem but I see a glaring hole as big as QB and HC. The whole franchise needs to restructure how the offense is built. Well it isn’t even built anyways, no real vision, distinct features or identity.

Root and stem. Minus a few obvious players.

Building around a RB is stupid as fug.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

CMC is a phenomenon 

can’t help the club in the tub however 

two years in the tub….hard to care honestly 

they have 3 running backs and don’t use any of them correctly so …..does it matter 

not popular I know but they should find  a way to work the compensation and get a 2 and a 3 for him from a contender   San Diego.  LA.  Come to mind  better for everybody 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So Willis had a good game against a poor defense and all of a sudden he is worth 50 million and is guaranteed to be better than Young. LOL I know he looked good in the 3 games he started, and I think he will have success long term, but anyone signing him up for a long term contract for 50 million is taking a huge risk. 
    • Is he really though? Rivera was past his prime and probably shouldn't have even started 2019 so his firing wasn't really unexpected or unwarranted. Rhule lasted two and a half years which was about one year too long in my opinion. Bringing him back that third year certainly wasn't impulsive and I would say Tepper was more patient than he should have been. Wilks finished out that third season and did pretty good but most everyone could see he really wasn't anything more than an intern HC. Bringing him back was not the long term answer so not bringing him back was the correct call. Hiring Reich was a mistake from the beginning and he recognized that fairly quickly. I am sure he knew he was going to catch a lot of sh*t for firing him so quickly ( and boy did he ) but it was absolutely the right thing to do given everything that was going on. The firing may have looked impulsive, but I think it was him recognizing he had royally f*ck up and just dealt with it instead of letting it fester.  That brings us to Canales. 2025 was only his second season and yet he delivered 8 wins and the NFC South title. And while that might not sound great, given the lack of talent and cap space they started with, it's a strong step in the right direction. I couldn't imagine Tepper not being pleased with their progress given the crap the Panthers' have been though under his ownership.
×
×
  • Create New...