Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Giants game


t96
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, CPantherKing said:

It's just preseason. They won't look like this in September. No way an NFL team would look like this in the regular season.

Yep, and that's where I'm at. 

Yes, this is probably by far the worst preseason performance by the Panthers in a while.

But I hope the coaches have a reason for this. Perhaps they're looking to see what weaknesses other teams pick up on.

If so, then I expect them to scheme around deficiencies and maximize strengths with the all star coaching staff they have.

If they continue looking like this come regular season, then I'd have many questions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Castavar said:

Also, we don't have the luxury of resting the starting O, play them a whole half until they get their sh*t together and score a fuggin TD. We have two division rivals to start the season, and the way it's looking we will be 0-2 in the division and season after two games.

Tbh, I was expecting that result all along and not because I’m a pessimist on the team. Facing a run heavy ATL on the road game 1 with a brand new 3-4 defense just never seemed like a good game for us, then getting a good vet QB in game 2. Our pre-bye schedule is rough for a team that is going to still be working things out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jayflip said:

Y'all need to take some breathes 

This is true. But this is also a franchise with 7 winning seasons in a quarter century and zero of them consecutive. You can acknowledge there's still plenty of time to get issues corrected but also call what you're seeing a duck when it walks and quacks like one. This is more of the same so far.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WhoKnows said:

Amazing we wasted a 3rd and a 4th on him, a 5th on Mayfield and a 2nd, 4th and 6th on Darnold. SMH.

Ya this is what poverty franchises do. We are bordering on that territory at this point.

I know it's preseason but something is lacking here and I can quite put my finger on it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • First, apologies @MHS831, I know you began this about tackles, and it was good. But... Frank, your post is just another Bryce sucks post. You obviously believe, like your buddy, that if we draft a WR it's all about evaluating Bryce Young or coddling Bryce Young. In short, it would be about improving the damned team. If anything, if Bryce is as destined to fail (or is already a failure right now... irredeemable), then another playmaker at WR would just seal the envelope and send him on his way. In my world, that's a good thing.  If some of you think that Bryce is a lame duck, then why wouldn't you want to set the offense up for the next QB to come in and be dropped into the offense to have success? Or, maybe you think it's all a moot point anyway because Tepper sucks, Dan Morgan sucks, Canales sucks, Ejiro sucks, Brandt Tilis sucks---everybidy sucks! If that's the case, then why does anyone care who or what we draft? Obviously some of you have all the answers and can run a gotdamn franchise better than the FO does now.
    • Yeah man, idk. I’m not super big on looking at the position group overall and damning the group. I’ll do the same with less words for WR. I think Proctor is the ultimate fit because he could be your future left or right tackle or left or right guard. Guys a starter, how much Zavala, Christensen, Curhan, and Corbett did we see last year again? Mauigoa will not be there when we pick, but you take him for the same reason you take Proctor minus maybe the LT. Freeling *could* be an upgrade at LT for the future. You don’t take Miller or Iheanahor because the position flexibility isn’t there, likely RT only guys. Those Utah guys are light in the ass, don’t want. Now I do WR. All extremely unproductive when compared to previous Round 1 WR. Tate- Gone Lemon- Complete player, not a burner, would take at 19 Tyson- Made of glass, Colorado washout  Cooper- Not the best hands. Like 300 of his yards were lucky ass stumble blooper looking poo. Bernard gives you similar but better in the 2nd. KC- Slaps then catches the ball. Lightning fast for about 20 yards. Good return man. poo QBs probably more to unlock. Would take at 19 if Proctor, Freeling, Lemon were gone. Washington guy- Lumbers, the smoothness Canales hyped for TMac, not there with him. We need a different style player.    
    • Logically yes. Boston has the right balance though. Jalen Brown is #2 in the paint and their best shooters are 17th and 19th. While our best shooters are #1 and #2 and we have one player in the top 50 for points in the paint. And my understanding looking at the information I just referenced is we were basically at the exact same paint percentage last year in Charles Lee's offense. At the end of the day we either want to compete for a playoff series winner and the finals or we just want to stumble our way to another play in. We've already done that with James Borrego.
×
×
  • Create New...