Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Giants game


t96
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Jmac said:

Meh....sick of excuses every fuggin season

Remember when our offense sucked last preseason and everybody was like "lol we are just running a vanilla offense, McAdoo isn't going to show his full hand" and then proceeded to go 1-4 out of the gate?

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MillionDollarCam said:

I hope Matt Corral has nothing but success whether it’s in the NFL or working at Enterprise.

I do however find it funny that people thought a QB from a college offense that basically asked the QB to hit his first read or hand the ball off would be successful.

Meanwhile Sam Howell is now the starting QB for the Commanders.

Fitty might be on the hot seat at the end of the year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the frustration with this team is not winning or losing in the preseason but more about how the team is performing. This team just looks unorganized and undisciplined, that doesn’t matter if it’s preseason or not. You need to execute no matter what. I don’t mind losing as long as we look like we are competing on the field, 2 games in preseason and we just look terrible 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jmac said:

Meh....sick of excuses every fuggin season

Well we are in a rebuild and the players have to learn the new coaches.. Maybe we just have suck ass players!! Just know we are undoing the Rhule error!! I am happy!! Reich already said no seasonal plays will be used!! So not sure why fans getting worried 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hard to interpret some of Brugler's opinions. Capable of running a robust route tree sounds like a lazy thing to say - I'm sure just about every slot TE is capable of running a full route tree... I want to know if he is currently able to (which from tape leads me to a no). Granted, it's pretty common for most receivers/TE not having a full route tree developed before they get drafted. Agility/acceleration after the catch hasn't shown up on his tape (at least his Oregon tape) for those dig/out breaking routes while it has for the seam and slant routes. Agree he has a good physical build and he is very good running seam routes. His build definitely helps him to shield defenders and create a large target point for the QB. Drops were a concern, but it could be focus drops just like T-Mac was/is prone to. Run blocking is an accurate statement, but again, we have only seen him run block in the slot/backfield - inline blocking is a whole different animal. With his athleticism, he definitely has a high ceiling. I just think he also has a low floor and don't like taking that big of a risk on a mid 1st rounder. I think this is a deep TE draft and would much rather target one in the 3rd or later. He's very boom or bust to me - bust in terms of being worth a 1st round pick, not an out of the NFL in a few years type bust. I feel like he gives me Evan Engram vibes. Not saying that Evan Engram was/is a bad NFL player, just that most people would agree he shouldn't have been drafted in the 1st.
    • I mean I would love 6-1. It’s funny the hurricanes usually dominate the first game and win by three or four goals. But keep the second game close. It would be nice if it’s the reverse of that tonight.
    • Brugler has him as TE1 and going to the Ravens in the first.  Apparently Sadiq's football IQ is pretty high (interviewed very well).  Also he was an WR and CB in high school.  This is why I always thought his route running was solid.  I'm sure it needs some polishing but for a TE it's pretty good. nfl.com Built like a bodyguard with a compact, well-defined frame. Capable of running a robust route tree. Gets in and out of breaks with good snap and separation. Vandalizes defensive seams with impunity against man coverage. Survives collisions with catches thanks to his hand strength. Shows off agility and acceleration after the catch. Fits up run blocks with proper positioning and base width. Grips and presses forward with moving feet to stay connected. -Again I don't know if we should take him but if he goes to the right team he could become a scary weapon at the next level.  I just like him as a prospect.
×
×
  • Create New...