Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Did Brian Burns play today?


Hoenheim
 Share

Recommended Posts

Yeah. He tackled Kamara for like an 8 yards loss. He also pressured Carr multiple times into the rest of his D-line. 
 

Now, broadly speaking, regarding our defense…I refuse to critique them anymore until we field a professional offense, which we haven’t done (arguably) since before Burns was drafted. Teddy was the best, but he was only good in the middle of the field, and was allergic to TD’s.

 

Its pathetic, and I’m tired of watching this unit fight for 3.5 quarters before being gassed and (I assume) mentally defeated.

 

 

 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Burns is not worth what he wants but the defense is far away from being the problem on this team. This defense is actually pretty good. 

This offense is the worst I’ve seen since 2010 and I actually think the 2023 offense is worse than the Jimmy Clausen led team. 
 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Anyone wanting to pay this guy like an elite defender is high as fug. Not taking those two 1sts was almost as bad of a trade decision as going up for Bryce.

It was worse because he is/was a known commodity and that deal was an absolute windfall. At least with Bryce there was some small iota of hope and potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been quite disappointed with him. But Burns or no Burns the culture of this team is in the toilet and I can't blame anyone on the defense for being fed up with the pitiful lack of offensive output. Even when guys like Derrick Brown make big game changing plays they are rewarded with their efforts by a field goal if we're lucky.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Anyone wanting to pay this guy like an elite defender is high as fug. Not taking those two 1sts was almost as bad of a trade decision as going up for Bryce.

Oh man.  Breaking down a few moments in sequence that really stand out:

-Pick 8 in 2021 could have produced 2 firsts, as we had offers per Fitt's post-draft presser.  That could have netted an extra first in 2022.  Instead, we had that huge gap between R1 and 4 in 2022 and mortgaged even more to trade up for Corral.  Not having a 2nd and 3rd clearly made Fitt and Rhule ansty to trade up when they could have sat and got Howell ahead of WAS.  

-The Burns offer last year could have given us a 2023 and 2024 1st.  We decline, yet we proceed to trade up and put ourselves in a position (again) where we need picks.  Mortgaged even more of what we had remaining because we got desperate, too needy.  Then, they treat the CMC package way too carelessly going all for this Bryce kid. 

The CMC picks were filling the voids we gave away for Darnold and Corral, they didn't truly net gain and we immediately waste them.    

Fitt has simply done an awful job.  And he hasn't brought in a single playmaker.  Just gave 2 away.  And I'm sure they declined interest again from a team like Detroit this season pre-deadline.

If this team was just patient and let certain things come to them, we could've had 2 firsts in the 22, 23, and 24 drafts.  Bezerk.  

Could have had a crop like Rashawn Slater (21), Garrett Wilson (22), Zion Johnson (22), & CJ Stroud with CMC and DJ Moore still in house, and an extra 1st in 2024.  And also more potential OL and DL from the picks that wouldn't have given away for Corral and Bryce.  They keep backing themselves into the corner, these forced situations, needing to force picks, missing the real talent.    

The careless QB carousel resulting in one of the biggest trades in NFL history ruined the rest of the team. So much talent missed.   

 

 

 

 

  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...