Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina Huddle Pick’em - Week 9


UpstatePanther

Recommended Posts

What a week!

SCOREBOARD:

WEEKLY WINNER: @Wyank PERFECT SCORE, 14/14, 1.000 (+1)

T-2) 13/14, .929

T-3) 12/14, .857

T-4) 11/14, .786

T-5) 10/14, .714

T-6) 9/14, .643

7) 6/14, .429

8) 4/14, .286

And the season standings out of 89 games:

41EF8B1F-A6C8-494B-A4ED-892E374E1A7C.thumb.jpeg.838bef4821d53b127c3a36f09d4509bc.jpeg

Our early leader drops alittle further in the standings, while the guy who knocked him off extends his lead. Lots of guys still very much in contention! Don’t give up now!

Week 8 Notes:

  1. Last week’s unanimous picks were Chicago and New England. Other locks were Houston, Cincy, Philly, KC, Pittsburgh, Indy,  and the LA Rams, along with our beloved Panthers!
  2. Upsets were Seattle and New Orleans (dammit).

 

Teams coming off a bye this week:

  • Atlanta
  • Los Angeles Chargers
  • Dallas 
  • Tennessee

Good luck this week everyone!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OAK @ SF: SF

PIT @ BAL: BAL <-- PO'd Ravens team bounces back

CHI @ BUF: CHI

CAR @ TB: CAR

KC @ CLE: KC

MIA @ NYJ: MIA

DET @ MIN: MIN

ATL @ WAS: WAS

HOU @ DEN: HOU

LAC @ SEA: SEA

LAR @ NO: NO Can't go against the Saints. Not at home -AND- West Coast teams do not tend to travel well.

GB @ NE: NE

TEN @ DAL: DAL 27, TEN 20 (47 Points)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OAK @ SF: OAK

PIT @ BAL: BAL

CHI @ BUF: CHI

CAR @ TB: CAR  

KC @ CLE: KC

NYJ @ MIA: MIA Mia is actually the home team

DET @ MIN: MIN

ATL @ WAS: ATL

HOU @ DEN: DEN

LAC @ SEA: SEA

LAR @ NO: NO

GB @ NE: NE

TEN @ DAL: DAL Total Points: 42

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OAK @ SF: OAK

PIT @ BAL: BAL

CHI @ BUF: CHI

CAR @ TB: CAR

KC @ CLE: KC

MIA @ NYJ: MIA (since they're the home team. who's sabotaging?)

DET @ MIN: MIN

ATL @ WAS: WAS

HOU @ DEN: HOU

LAC @ SEA: SEA

LAR @ NO: NO

GB @ NE: GB

TEN @ DAL: TEN Total Points: 18 Yeah, 18, will be an awful fuging game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MHS--GETTING LARGE IN YOUR REAR VIEW MIRRORS (AND SIDE VIEW TOO):

image.png.a06afb172035bca3782f2c2e7cb0f679.png

OAK @ SF: SF

PIT @ BAL: BAL

CHI @ BUF: CHI

CAR @ TB: CAR

KC @ CLE: KC

MIA @ NYJ: NYJ

DET @ MIN: MIN

ATL @ WAS: WAS

HOU @ DEN: DEN

LAC @ SEA: LAC

LAR @ NO: LAR

GB @ NE: GB

TEN @ DAL: DAL Total Points: 43

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think everyone says Mike Evans because of size, but really they have different strengths and play styles.  Tmac is better on intermediate routes and not nearly as good at contested catches. 
    • At this point, it is criminal to go into the 2026 training camp/OTA's with XL penciled in as a #2 WR. The team must upgrade, either through free agency or the draft. If he cannot give 100% effort on significantly less snaps as a #4-6 WR(players like Tremayne have done that consistently) then I don't think you have a player worth rostering beyond the trade deadline. Offensively, we eventually have to upgrade to an NFL starting caliber C. It's been almost the length of time from Gross to Ikey since Kalil retired and we have below average to terrible C play. Love Mays as a BC-esque utility backup but he will never be an above average long term starting C.  The TE room is one of the worst in the NFL but it's a low usage position in this offense, so the investments are likely to be small, if any. I would never expect to see an elite TE in a Dave Canales offense. 100% agree on OL depth. We actually aren't bad there but BC will be gone, Mays is a UFA, Corbett is a UFA and Zavala has been both injured and bad. We have to bolster that depth again or resign guys like Mays and Corbett to keep that depth somewhat stable.
    • Bingo. The dude is a baller no doubt and I'd love to have him in a vacuum but like you said he's gonna fetch a haul so the only teams it really makes sense for are teams with an overall good roster who they feel an edge rusher like Crosby would out them over the top in terms of competing for SBs. I'd be looking st teams like the Pats, Bucs, Ravens, Seahawks, etc. It wouldn't be shocking to see him moved. He may be more valuable to a rebuilding team in the form of the draft assets he'd fetch than he is on the field. He should still have several more good years in the tank at 28 but by the time the Raiders can reasonably expect to rebuild he's gonna be on the decline.
×
×
  • Create New...