Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Week 1 Post Script: Zach Wilson injured


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, ThPantherFan said:

you like to straddle the fence?  Just messing with you.

Hahaha, you are not wrong. There is so much childish bickering and arguing going on so I wanted to make clear that was not the purpose of my question. I was genuinely interested in his opinion.

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

The talk on him pre-draft was that while his skill set was great, it was questionable whether he could take the kind of punishment the NFL dishes out.

NFL punishment is one thing but I doubt even Brett Favre would make it through a season of games featuring the level of beat down we out on him in week one.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

This cannot be true.  Wilson was behind a top 10 line according to PFF.

He is behind a much better line than Sam was - young, but still better.  Sam didn’t even have a center that could snap the ball….jumping up to catch a ball snapped over your head, takes valuable time from surveying the field and making your reads to throw.

*Just checked, Wilson is taller than I thought, same height as Sam, but not as husky/sturdy.

Edited by 1usctrojan
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, 1usctrojan said:

My heart goes out to the young man.  Out of BYU, he played behind a massive oline of 40 year olds protecting him….now, everyone is big, fast and strong.  Bet on injured and out for a few more games….ouch.

He played on teams that were far more talented than the teams they were playing against.  Just like most of the qb's that were drafted in the first round this year.  So far, of the ones that have actually played, it seems like only Mac Jones has adapted well.  But he probably went into the best situation.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Durability questions aren't limited to certain kinds of injuries.

Eh. Some injuries are due to smaller frame, degenerative joints, etc things that can be foreseen and concerned about. Some injuries are just freak injuries that can happen to anyone. Someone who people project injury concerns on getting a freak injury doesn’t verify those concerns. Correlation doesn’t imply causation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You see, I just don't subscribe to a cookie cutter type of philosophy when it comes to trades or team building. Every situation is different. Many may disagree, but I think that FOs that can't draft impact-players beyond the first round aren't really viable.  Just for argument's sake, because we all know this hypothetical trade is as realistic as the moon being made of cheese, Micah is a young dawg really just beginning his prime and is arguably the most valuable pass rusher in the league. He could realistically play at a high level for at least the next five to seven years. Parsons' current trajectory is Canton. That being said, he's not some old merc that fits the mold of "one piece away," he's a core piece to any defense for the better part of the next 10 years. Pass rushers of his caliber and age don't generally become available, so, sure, he'd help an elite team, but he's also a fit for a younger team that's building. I know that you don't agree, but it's all good. I respect your rationale.
    • Here's my not important take on this subject.  Who wouldn't want a pass rusher of his consistency?  I would absolutely love to have him on this defense.   Would I give up Brown in a trade for him.  Nope, I would never do that.  Interior linemen are way to important to be settling for whatever you can get at the position.   Would I trade 2 firsts,  plus fork out a big contract for him?   Without knowing if Young is for sure going to be our long term, franchise guy,  there is no way I'd be okay with letting go 2 firsts. As for the contract that he'd demand, I just dont get caught up with NFL contracts.  They have been out of control for decades.  So I really dont get upset over big contracts. It's just a fact of life in the NFL.  You HAVE to pay for talent. 
×
×
  • Create New...