Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Opinions on who is at fault for Cam's departure??


WOW!!
 Share

Recommended Posts

Alot of y’all werent there for that TNF game against Tampa

my stance was always to let 2020 be Cam’s prove it year and go from there but I don’t blame any regime for watching the last few games of  the end of 2018 and that TNF game against Tampa and being convinced Cam was done. I remember after that game one of those twitter film guys who was always a huge Cam supporter was breaking down all of his throws and being convinced he was done . I personally thought he was, my issue was we could have let him prove for one season that he wasnt. It was such an easy and logical choice for me that had zero risk and huge rewards

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, KillaCamNewton said:

Alot of y’all werent there for that TNF game against Tampa

my stance was always to let 2020 be Cam’s prove it year and go from there but I don’t blame any regime for watching the last few games of  the end of 2018 and that TNF game against Tampa and being convinced Cam was done. I remember after that game one of those twitter film guys who was always a huge Cam supporter was breaking down all of his throws and being convinced he was done . I personally thought he was, my issue was we could have let him prove for one season that he wasnt. It was such an easy and logical choice for me that had zero risk and huge rewards

I sometimes watch some of the talking heads opinions when we make big time signings and this Nick guy hits on it perfectly. If you move on from Cam you better be damn sure you have a plan. What we have done since has been a disaster.

 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cookie Lyon said:

THIS

Just curious. You don’t think Cam’s injury history and indirectly asking for a new contract on social media had anything to do with it? You think it was 100% one-sided and Cam did everything perfect from his side?

I think it was handled poorly from both sides, but it is obviously totally fine to have a different take on it.

I’m really happy to have Cam back btw, but again I think both sides had some responsibility for how it went down.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, firefox1234 said:

I understood the logic of letting Cam go. It was the following decisions at the QB position that I’m pissed about…

I wanted him back for that last year because I wanted to believe he wasn't done. The truth is, it wouldn't have helped him much nor would it have helped us much.

But, like you said, the decision was amplified by the bad Teddy contract and then the trade/5th year option for Sam fuging Darnold.

Hindsight is always tough but it wasn't that hard to not make the bad decisions that we DID make. That is what ended up being so upsetting.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MechaZain said:

Rhule's press conference debunked this for me. A lot of praise for his ethic and said he liked being around Cam. It really seems like it was 100% about his health and that they feel a lot better about where he is now.

You believe anything that lying grifter says? 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No 1 side is fully to blame.  If there is a culprit in all this it would either be Ego (not Igo), or Pride.

Cam did not want to play for (not)Rivera.  Was a Hurney pick, the unquestioned face of the franchise, and a loyal Jerry supporter.

On the flip?

Mind-numbingly obtuse, fat fingered, naïveté at Every. Single.  LEVEL. From cocky coach, to hedge fund money dummy owner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Icege said:

Don't care.

All that matters is the upcoming game against Arizona.

Through it all this is the truth. We know the mistakes. There will be plenty of time to talk about it in the offseason. But for now it is time to put that aside and try to enjoy football again. We don't need the offense to be great. Just move the ball and score some points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...