Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Matt Rhule the most hated person in Panthers history?


ENCPantherfan2
 Share

Recommended Posts

Yes, well for me anyway.  It’s the incompetence and the arrogance about the incompetence that I can’t stand. Rhule wants to piss on your leg and tell you it’s raining (you can’t see my progress but it’s there!). Most hardcore fans aren’t dumb. We might not be the most objective people in the world but we know when someone is full of poo. And rhule is full of poo. All of the other prior coaches at least acted in good faith and never gave the impression that they were just fraudulent con artists like rhule. The day he is gone will be a huge relief for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh, "hate" is a strong word for someone that's in wayyyyy over their head. I hate the way he throws his players under the bus after a game. I hate his game management skills. But I don't hate the dude, that's just petty.

But the Huddle loves it's negativity. It keeps us warm at night. So I guess we all get tickets to the Hater's Ball this year (and probably next year too). We form into some kind of hate-fueled Voltron when we all come together like this. 

My advice? Let go of the hate. Or at least rub one out before the game starts. Then at least you can take that upcoming Loss without a loaded gun in your pants. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t hate him. I wish him the best once he is out of here. He seems like a nice guy and family man.

But as a professional NFL coach he is awful. It’s without question that he has assembled the worst coaching staff in the team’s history. it’s nothing personal with him but he needs to be let go as soon as the season ends.

 

I am not a fan of Jerry Richardson, professionally or personally. Sure, He brought us the Panthers but if he didn’t do it someone else would have. Richardson is the typical rich affluent white male who gets away with being a shithead because he is rich.

so for me, Rae Carruth and old man Richardson are on the I don’t like you professionally or personally list. 
 

a sleeper for that list is Deangelo Williams  

 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think he did a solid job.  Honestly I liked his post game interview the best.  He gave himself a C and said he left a lot out on the field.  That kind of attitude can carry him far.
    • This is lacking a fairly considerable amount of context. For one, Adams(age 22) started 12 of 16 games, had 38 rec, 446 yds and 3 TD's on 66 targets(18 less, with 2 less games started). The main thing missing here is that the top two WR's for Green Bay that year combined for about 2800 yds and 25 TD's. Now if you want to throw a more accurate dart at Adams, take a look at year two. This year the production was spread around considerably and Adams didn't stand out from that pack(pun not intended).  So, if XL struggles mightily this season, I would probably keep that comparison in your quiver to counter argue. I would suggest that I don't think that scenario is probably very accurate for most HOF caliber WR's taken in the first round over the past 15 or so years. Adams was the 89th pick overall, as well. A little different hill to climb than XL, although not massively.
    • to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
×
×
  • Create New...