Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would it not be smart to keep M.C around?


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

I just like options. Corral is a young guy with a live arm and plenty of athleticism.

 

The #1 pick will be too. 
 

I just want the QB position fixed (no poo we all do), I’d rather have two guys with potential than one.
 

If Stroud/Young ball out of control then sure, get rid of Corral…but damn it seems stupid to do so before we see the rookie play a down at the next level.  

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, stan786 said:

I doubt he has any trade value so I imagine he’ll have the preseason to show what he has. Staff has zero loyalty to him and he’s not going to get a ton of quality reps but hopefully he’s up to the challenge and can show enough they want to develop him.

He talked all the time about his big mistake of not staying at Florida and competing since iron sharpens iron and taking the easy way out with a easy path to starting at Ole Miss. His chance to prove it. To me his concerns are the same as Young except Corral can't keep himself healthy like Young can.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep him! He still has a very quick release. He plays physical. Plus, we saw what could happen with the 49ers when your high draft pick QB goes down. Not saying Matt Corral is Brock Purdy but maybe he’s similar? Point is, you keep him. If we can develop the kid and later trade him for picks then it’s a win-win. Plus, he’s essentially a rookie QB under this new regime so we’ll have two rookie QBs who can learn together. He was also Chris Simms #1 rated QB last year and now we’ll pair him with this year’s #1 QB. Keep Corral. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Already spent premium draft capital on him so they might as well keep him through training camp. Maybe he shows Frank Reich he can be a long term backup or more. We have really barely seen him play at all let alone under a competent coaching staff. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

 

forgive me there was a poster that said frank got one look at the QB room and was like  "ALLL youz got to GO!!!"......its looking real.

 

I hope corral is healthy enough to OTA and rookie camp. I bet in order to remain a panther, he must show them something. I think if not, the new staff will cut him without care. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that's totally fair to say, but I think it also shows you guys are conflating what I'm saying with thinking I'm saying something like, "T-Mac will 100% have a better NFL career than Chark had" which is a completely different statement and one I'd agree, you can't really say about any NFL player before they've ever taken a snap. Because what I'm saying, is that T-Mac's actual ability and skills right now, are at a higher level than Chark's ever were, it's a completely different statement that is independent of what his NFL output will be. But even with those other prospects, I'm sure some of them before their NFL career started, still had more ability and physical talent than Chark had, because again, this is so much less about T-Mac and so much more about Chark.  A bad coach, system, QB, injuries, etc, that derail a WR's career no matter how good they may have been and is much more of the reason they were a bust than their own abilities.   Chark was a tall WR with little WR speed, he was a deep ball threat and wasn't even particularly great at it, he was not that good of an actual WR. If the Jags had another above average WR in 2019, then Chark doesn't get his 1k season that I think people are getting too hung up on in thinking he was some great player in this league.
    • I've just seen enough highly touted prospects who pretty much everyone was high on end up busting to assume anything.
    • Maybe, but a player can also bust for a lot of reasons.  And I'm not about to go look up the stats of all the 1st round WR busts, but I'd be surprised if they had the sustained output and success in college that T-Mac had.  Those early WR busts are usually guys who had one breakout season and then were highly drafted because of physical potential, not already built out ability. I'm not even saying T-Mac is 100% going to have a better career than Chark (although I obviously think he will). I'm just saying that right now, his skill level and ability is better than Chark's ever was, and I don't understand how anyone is arguing against that, not because of T-Mac, but because of who Chark himself was.   If you want to take the argument that you can't say ANY player who hasn't played a down yet can't be considered better than someone who has, then so be it (even though I'd say that's a dumb stance anyways). At his peak ability, Chark was more like a #3 WR than anything else, he was the definition of a league average WR.  If you don't think a Top 10 selected WR with his tape is better than that just because they haven't played in the NFL yet, then you're just stuck on the "he hasn't played a down yet" idea and can't evaluate them as players and abilities.
×
×
  • Create New...