Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would it not be smart to keep M.C around?


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

I just like options. Corral is a young guy with a live arm and plenty of athleticism.

 

The #1 pick will be too. 
 

I just want the QB position fixed (no poo we all do), I’d rather have two guys with potential than one.
 

If Stroud/Young ball out of control then sure, get rid of Corral…but damn it seems stupid to do so before we see the rookie play a down at the next level.  

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, stan786 said:

I doubt he has any trade value so I imagine he’ll have the preseason to show what he has. Staff has zero loyalty to him and he’s not going to get a ton of quality reps but hopefully he’s up to the challenge and can show enough they want to develop him.

He talked all the time about his big mistake of not staying at Florida and competing since iron sharpens iron and taking the easy way out with a easy path to starting at Ole Miss. His chance to prove it. To me his concerns are the same as Young except Corral can't keep himself healthy like Young can.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep him! He still has a very quick release. He plays physical. Plus, we saw what could happen with the 49ers when your high draft pick QB goes down. Not saying Matt Corral is Brock Purdy but maybe he’s similar? Point is, you keep him. If we can develop the kid and later trade him for picks then it’s a win-win. Plus, he’s essentially a rookie QB under this new regime so we’ll have two rookie QBs who can learn together. He was also Chris Simms #1 rated QB last year and now we’ll pair him with this year’s #1 QB. Keep Corral. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Already spent premium draft capital on him so they might as well keep him through training camp. Maybe he shows Frank Reich he can be a long term backup or more. We have really barely seen him play at all let alone under a competent coaching staff. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

 

forgive me there was a poster that said frank got one look at the QB room and was like  "ALLL youz got to GO!!!"......its looking real.

 

I hope corral is healthy enough to OTA and rookie camp. I bet in order to remain a panther, he must show them something. I think if not, the new staff will cut him without care. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well that's part of where the disconnect is then, you think Chark was a "solid NFL player" I couldn't disagree more, he's someone who had one solid NFL season and then was at best a JAG the rest of his career, I wouldn't call that a "solid NFL player" If he was a #3 WR and put up the stats he did outside of that 1 season, then sure, he's a "solid NFL player" but he put up those numbers as the #1 WR in 3 of his 4 seasons that he had meaningful roles and the #2 in a high powered offense the 4th.   That's not good and not what I'd call a "solid NFL player"
    • Everything always makes sense in hindsight. Hell, I've seen guys who were touted by everyone as slam dunk "safest player in the draft" type prospects bust massively. Remember Aaron Curry? Robert Gallery? I'm just never going to say that a prospect is definitely a better NFL player than a solid NFL player. Better as a prospect? Sure, you can always make those arguments. But ultimately it comes down to what you do on Sundays and what you did on Saturdays just isn't relevant when you're talking about who's the better NFL player.
    • And that's totally fair to say, but I think it also shows you guys are conflating what I'm saying with thinking I'm saying something like, "T-Mac will 100% have a better NFL career than Chark had" which is a completely different statement and one I'd agree, you can't really say about any NFL player before they've ever taken a snap. Because what I'm saying, is that T-Mac's actual ability and skills right now, are at a higher level than Chark's ever were, it's a completely different statement that is independent of what his NFL output will be. Look at it this way, without even knowing what the rest of Chark's career turned out to be, would anyone seriously say they'd take Chark after the 2019 season over today's T-Mac if they somehow were in a draft and we were deciding between the two?  As even after that season, his potential was never what T-Mac's is right now. Even with those other prospects, I'm sure some of them before their NFL career started, still had more ability and physical talent than Chark had, because again, this is so much less about T-Mac and so much more about Chark.  A bad coach, system, QB, injuries, etc, that derail a WR's career no matter how good they may have been and is much more of the reason they were a bust than their own abilities.   Chark was a tall WR with little WR speed, he was a deep ball threat and wasn't even particularly great at it, he was not that good of an actual WR. If the Jags had another above average WR in 2019, then Chark doesn't get his 1k season that I think people are getting too hung up on in thinking he was some great player in this league.
×
×
  • Create New...