Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CarolinaHuddle Pick'em - Week 5


UpstatePanther

Recommended Posts

Hey y'all great job this week! It was a better week for almost everyone! Don't have alot to say this week so let's get right down to business. 

SCOREBOARD:

1) @Zaximus 12/15*, .800 - wins MNF tiebreaker

2) @X-Clown on 1 12/15, .800

T-3) @DudeNamedJeremy 11/15, .733

T-3) @PntherPryd 11/15, .733

T-3) @bigdavis 11/15, .733

T-4) UpstatePanther 10/15, .667

T-4) @Moorgan 10/15, .667

T-4) @Bronn 10/15, .667

T-4) @Kevin Greene 10/15, .667

T-4) @Datawire 10/15, .667

T-4) @Chosen Newton 10/15, .667

T-4) @Boxhead85 10/15, .667

T-4) @FakePlasticTrees 10/15, .667

T-4) @Cracka McNasty 10/15, .667

T-4) @CRA 10/15, .667

T-4) @Liminy 10/15, .667

T-5) @kungfoodude 9/15, .600

T-5) @ChibCU 9/15, .600

T-5) @yayfootball 9/15, .600

T-5) @XOBlackxJokerOX 9/15, .600

T-5) @Wyank 9/15, .600

T-5) @panther4life 9/15, .600

T-5) @L-TownCat 9/15, .600

T-5) @Khyber53 9/15, .600

T-5) @KBRed 9/15, .600

T-5) @luke nukem 9/15, .600

T-5) @gtanaka 9/15, .600

T-6) @bababoey 8/15, .533

T-6) @mbarbour21 8/15, .533

T-6) @grimesgoat 8/15, .533

T-6) @Panthers8969 8/15, .533

T-6) @Kuhndog94 8/15, .533

7) @PantherNation123 7/15, .467

T-8) @RumHam 6/15, .400

T-8) @Saca312 6/15, .400

Congrats to Zaximus for winning on the tiebreaker and earning the Power Point!

• The unanimous pick this week was the Chargers game, though I think we all sweated that one out a bit!

• other locks were KC, GB, and JAX. 

• upsets were DAL, TEN, and BAL

BB529778-FAD5-439E-9DD4-0E15FDBC31EC.thumb.jpeg.2cced22138ecd197a7653d673ba7a5a2.jpeg

The above standings are out of 31 games so a far. DudeNamedJeremy is killing it so far!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IND @ NE: NE

TEN @ BUF: TEN

NYG @ CAR: CAR

MIA @ CIN: CIN

BAL @ CLE: BAL

GB @ DET: GB

JAX @ KC: KC

DEN @ NYJ: DEN

ATL @ PIT: ATL

OAK @ LAC: LAC

MIN @ PHI: PHI

AZ @ SF: SF

LAR @ SEA: LAR

DAL @ HOU: DAL

WAS @ NO: NO

MNF total score: 55pts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah! Not in last place no more!!

IND @ NE: NE

TEN @ BUF: TEN

NYG @ CAR: CAR

MIA @ CIN: CIN

BAL @ CLE: BAL

GB @ DET: GB

JAX @ KC: KC

DEN @ NYJ: DEN

ATL @ PIT: PIT

OAK @ LAC: LAC

MIN @ PHI: PHI

AZ @ SF: AZ

LAR @ SEA: LAR

DAL @ HOU: HOU

WAS @ NO: NO

MNF total score: 48

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before I pick, I'd like to point out that we as casual panther fans are better than a bunch of analysts in the league as the vast majority are over .500 picking so far this year. 

 

IND @ NE: NE

TEN @ BUF: TEN

NYG @ CAR: CAR

MIA @ CIN: CIN

BAL @ CLE: BAL

GB @ DET: GB

JAX @ KC: KC

DEN @ NYJ: DEN

ATL @ PIT: ATL

OAK @ LAC: LAC

MIN @ PHI: MIN

AZ @ SF: SF

LAR @ SEA: LAR

DAL @ HOU: HOU

WAS @ NO: NO

MNF total score: 65pts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IND @ NE: NE

TEN @ BUF: TEN

NYG @ CAR: CAR

MIA @ CIN: CIN

BAL @ CLE: BAL

GB @ DET: GB

JAX @ KC: KC

DEN @ NYJ: DEN

ATL @ PIT: ATL (As much as I hate it)

OAK @ LAC: LAC

MIN @ PHI: PHI

AZ @ SF: SF

LAR @ SEA: LAR

DAL @ HOU: HOU

WAS @ NO: NO (Again, as much as I hate it)

MNF total score: 65 points (34-31 NO)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, UpstatePanther said:

UP's picks for Week 5:

 

IND @ NE: NE

TEN @ BUF: TEN

NYG @ CAR: CAR

MIA @ CIN: CIN

BAL @ CLE: CLE

GB @ DET: DET

JAX @ KC: KC

DEN @ NYJ: DEN

ATL @ PIT: PIT

OAK @ LAC: OAK

MIN @ PHI: MIN

AZ @ SF: SF

LAR @ SEA: LAR

DAL @ HOU: DAL

WAS @ NO: WAS

MNF total score: 54 pts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IND @ NE: NE

TEN @ BUF: TEN

NYG @ CAR: CAR

MIA @ CIN: CIN

BAL @ CLE: BAL

GB @ DET: GB

JAX @ KC: KC

DEN @ NYJ: DEN

ATL @ PIT: ATL

OAK @ LAC: OAK

MIN @ PHI: PHI

AZ @ SF: AZ

LAR @ SEA: LAR

DAL @ HOU: HOU

WAS @ NO: NO

MNF total score: 84 pts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MHS

IND @ NE: NE

TEN @ BUF: TEN

NYG @ CAR: CAR

MIA @ CIN: MIA

BAL @ CLE:   CLE

GB @ DET: GB

JAX @ KC: KC

DEN @ NYJ: DEN

ATL @ PIT: PIT

OAK @ LAC: LAC

MIN @ PHI: PHI

AZ @ SF: AZ

LAR @ SEA: LAR

DAL @ HOU: DAL

WAS @ NO: NO

MNF: 64

Headlines: 

KC  slams Jags in a  shootout

Browns get third non-loss of season by upsetting Ravens

Panthers hurt scorned Gettlemen's feelings in blowout

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My general take on the state of the team not going too in depth is this: Either Morgan or Canales (hard to say whether it’s the players or the system/coaching, and that goes for any team) has been responsible for considerable strides forward on D and a bit more productive offense, but it’s been a small sample size and we collapsed at the end of the year. I lean towards it being more Canales growing as a coach and building a culture of buy-in and getting the most out of players in the locker room. My reasoning for leaning there is that Morgan was part of the Fitterer stink and it’ll take him a while of sustained success in roster management to overcome that in my mind. Next year is a big year to see if that was a fluke or not. These big signings this offseason are exciting and sometimes teams can have amazing FA classes but more often than not those who spend big and “win the offseason” don’t show the results in the regular season.    As far as QB goes, in a vacuum I’m completely fine with the Pickett signing, he’s ok value for a backup and a huge improvement over Dalton. If Bryce went down there isn’t a huge drop off there and if the rest of the team builds on last year they could win games with him under center. I’m not sure the ‘85 Bears could win games with current Dalton under center. But the O is just so damn limited with Bryce and Pickett does not push him at all, he’s purely a backup. So I agree we I’d love to see a QB with some upside drafted, a guy who could actually push Bryce if/when he struggles or doesn’t improve any further. He’s improved steadily the last 2 years but it has been from arguably worst in league history to still below average. I’m not convinced he can get any better than purely average at absolute best. I hope he can man but I just don’t see it happening. And the longer we keep penciling him as starter the less confidence I have in this staff. Even with our unexpected relative success as a team last year sometimes you do have to take another step back to take a step forward, and that could mean moving on from Bryce, and temporarily going with a slightly worse player like Pickett while aggressively trying to upgrade the position and taking dart throws in the draft/free agency on upside players. I know, there wasn’t much available this offseason outside of Willis, and this draft class seems to be poor at QB. But I’d have preferred we try something and if it didn’t work and we took a step back then just keep trying until something hits. Rolling with Bryce is just delaying the inevitable and living in purgatory.    just my 2 cents, hope I’m proved wrong
    • His market value is 15.7 million. Not worth it to bring him at his age, at that price. If we were to bring in a veteran, DeAndre Hopkins is available for 2 million market value. I've said this in other threads, get Keenan Allen to play the slot. He's as good as a pass catching tight end and is market is under 7 million.
×
×
  • Create New...