Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Round 1 - Carolina Panthers Select CB Jaycee Horn


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

If the Panthers didn't like Slater as a LT, then I can see then passing on him and no other LT was in sniffing distance of #8.  Darrisaw would have been a major reach at #8. The are several LTs to target in the 2nd round.  I like Cosmi or Randunz at #39 if still on the board.

I agree. Sewell was the dream though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BIGH2001 said:
4 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

Terrible pick. Hope I’m wrong. I absolutely hate it a ton. Dude has plenty of opportunities to make me regret it like I regretted hating on our 2005 first-rounder, but this feels like another in a long line of Tepper failures. 

Tepper has been nothing short of a total clown

Tepper has no control...

...Rhule is 100% in charge according to @Mr. Scot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Zaximus said:

All I can think about is "Damn I hope that Washington win was worth it".   It wasn't.

This team continues to need an LT and line help.   Year after year since Gross.   We literally watched a franchise QB get killed over his time here and yet we still choose a CB.   That's my issue.   I know we need CB but I feel an LT is much more important right now.   I'm not even mad about skipping Fields though that still may have been a better pick.   I'm just mad about not grabbing an LT or not successfully trading down at least.   

We are putting a LOT of faith in a failed QB on another team (albeit still young).   I think Rhule's coaching time at Carolina is going to come down to Sam Darnold, if he can turn it around or not.

We have to hit some home runs in the next days coming up, specifically OL please.

Yeah it wasn't. If we gave more time to our backups and we still won, then so be it. I wouldn't be as upset over it, but going into it and playing the starters the whole game and acting like we still had a chance to make the playoffs was just dumb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I enjoy being truthful. Although that means being unbiased. Which most on here are incapable of being unbiased. 
    • It looks like the Bucks and Giannis are headed for a divorce. He says he's ready to play and the Bucks say that he has told them he isn't. It really doesn't matter except that it likely means the end for Giannis in Milwaukee. He's 31 years old, but still an elite producer.  So, as GM, would you go after him this offseason? Remember, the Hornets have two 1st round picks this year and potentially THREE first round picks next year. What would a trade look like?
    • I agree with you, if all things are equal--assuming we are on the same page as to what that means.  If a DT and OT are there at 19 and you have them equal, which do you take? The DT would be rotational and get 25 snaps a game or so, and the OT is probably a reserve for most of the season.  What if Walker plays out of his mind and Ickey comes back strong? To me, there are just too many variables at T and Morgan met the needs for 2 starters.  Nothing about that screams lets "go OT in round 1" to me. I could see an Edge or a DT at 19 before I see OT.  I could see a TE or S before an OT--and I (personally) would rather have an OT over DT, Edge, TE, or S--but I do not see the logic.  In fact, CB is a position that resembles OT--who do we have behind our starters and are we happy with Smith-Wade?  A CB would be on the field more than a reserve OT.  How is the Walker at LT situation different than the the Bryce situation? He is basically on a 1-year deal and if he is injured, Forsythe becomes Pickett.  Would you take Simpson in the draft?  Dont get me wrong--I usually agree with you  and I get your point.  I am an OL guru--but I just do not see this particular group of Tackles making us better than Walker.  In addition, I think we can address OT once the Ickey situation clears up.  Short arms, poor run blocking, issues with strength--I am simply not impressed with the OTs.  For clarity, "developmental" refers to players who are still a year or two away from starting.  We are all developmental, but there are prospects who need a season to transition to the pro game. I see 1--maybe 2 OTs who could step into a starting role right now. In college, for example, taking snaps under center requires a different approach than blocking for the shotgun.  There is less to learn if you play a position that does not require much adjustment to transition to the NFL.
×
×
  • Create New...