Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Darnold plays well,do they keep him around?


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

I don’t think I have ever seen as bad of a Free Agent QB list as this off-season before. 
Usually there is some QB that makes you think “maybe if” but not this year. 
Hope this doesn’t mean we are in for another year of down football. 
NFL has been so bad this year. 

Yup, when you start losing the Fitzpatricks and Philip Rivers, Brees', and the other ones that didn't retire are falling off dramatically like Ryan/Russ/Cam/Brady/Rodgers it's rough. There was an insane amount of solid 10-20 year franchise QB's until the last year or two

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It honesty doesn’t matter. Corral’s ceiling is a back up. A worthwhile FA isn’t coming here. Tepper sucks as owner and will keep Fits. And this franchise isn’t going anywhere anyways until the draft a franchise QB, which will likely come from a top pick.

Until that QB is drafted, it really, honestly doesn’t matter what scrub is out back there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think we keep Sam, but we're not going to be in a good spot in the draft for a QB imo. I expect to see a new veteran QB to start while Corral continues to learn. Don't expect the Panthers to have a good season any time soon. Long way to go.

If Sam somehow lights it up the rest of the season, then that changes the conversation.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's all going to depend on who the next HC is.  If Sam plays really well, we win games, and he makes plays, then I have no problem with making him a backup.

I also have no problem letting him go with everyone else and starting fresh.  I just want to know who our coach is in 2023...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...